Is Upton Conductiong Aerial Spraying Again

Is your informed consent required for the authorities to engage in the aerial spraying of chemicals into the air that you breathe? The answer would seem to be "no".  Public Constabulary 105-85 is online, and available for public viewing. In this document we read:

The Secretary of Defense may not acquit (direct or past contract)—
(1) whatsoever test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or
(2) whatever other testing of a chemical amanuensis or biological agent on human subjects.

This seems to say that they must acquire your consent.  …Or does information technology?…  Delight read on to section (b)…

(b) EXCEPTIONS.—Discipline to subsections (c), (d), and (e), the prohibition in subsection (a) does not employ to a examination or experiment carried out for whatsoever of the post-obit purposes:
(1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical,therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or enquiry activity.
(2) Whatsoever purpose that is straight related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents.
(3) Any police force enforcement purpose, including whatsoever purpose related to riot control.
(c) INFORMED CONSENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense may carry a test or experiment described in subsection (b) simply if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in accelerate of the testing on that subject field.
(d) PRIOR Find TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 30 days after the date of concluding approval within the Department of Defense of plans for any experiment or study to be conducted past the Section of Defense force (whether directly or under contract) involving the use of human subjects for the testing of a chemic agent or a biological amanuensis, the Secretary of Defence force shall submit to the Committee on Armed forces of the Senate and the Committee on National Security of the House of Representatives a report setting along a full bookkeeping of those plans, and the experiment or study may then be conducted only after the end of the 30- 24-hour interval menstruum beginning on the date such written report is received by those committees….

So section (a) prohibits these cruel and inhumane chemic and biological tests on humans.

Then section (b) says that the prohibitions in section (a) do non utilize to tests carried out for almost any purpose. So department (b) completely negates the prohibitions of section (a).

In Other Words:
The U.S. government tin examination chemicals and biological agents on humans for nearly whatever purpose they want.

The Following Should Also Be Noted
The term "biological amanuensis" as stated above in (a)(1) is defined in (e) every bit follows:

Quote:

(e) BIOLOGICAL Amanuensis DEFINED.—In this department, the term ''biological agent'' means any micro-organism (including bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance, and whatsoever naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized component of whatsoever such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance, whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable of causing—

    (i) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an brute, a institute, or another living organism;

    (2) deterioration of food, h2o, equipment, supplies, or materials of any kind; or

     (3) deleterious alteration of the environment.

In Other Words:
The U.S. government tin test chemicals and biological agents on humans that cause death, biological malfunction, and deleterious alteration of the environs. The term "deleterious alteration of the environment" brings chemtrails to mind.

Informed Consent

Some argue that none of this activity tin can be conducted without "informed consent", as stated in section (c), which reads:

Quote:

(c) INFORMED CONSENT REQUIRED.—The Secretarial assistant of Defense
may deport a test or experiment described in subsection (b) just if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human field of study in advance of the testing on that field of study.

Although section (c) seems to provide some protection for us in that it requires us to be notified "in advance" if this "testing" is to take place, in reality, it does not provide any protection at all.

Why not?

Because you've already been "informed in accelerate" and yous've already given your "consent".

Considering this "law" is publicly bachelor for anybody to read, yous have been "informed". Because you take not contested it (that's what the courts are for), you have provided your "consent".

This police is part of a contract between y'all and the government. When the terms of a contract are known and uncontested, it's chosen "acquiescence". Amenability essentially means that both parties are in agreement.

Acquiesce: "submit or comply silently or without protest"

So, when this law was published, yous were "informed". Because yous take not challenged it in court, you have "consented". By your own inaction, you lot accept said, "Sure, go ahead and poisonous substance me, fifty-fifty if it causes death. I take no trouble with it."

Because this contract meets the judicial requirements of "remedy" and "recourse", it is legally binding.

Judges like to say: "Ignorance of the law is no excuse". They say this because you are expected to know all of the "law" because information technology is publicly bachelor for y'all to read (despite the fact that this is humanly impossible).

So, in reality, section (c) is legally useless. It does not provide any additional protection, it only "seems" to. Section (c)'south only purpose for existence included in this police force is deception, nothing more.

Deception

Section (c) of this "police" is very deceptive because most people don't understand the concepts of acquiescence in contract police, therefore, people mistakenly conclude that this "testing" will never happen to them unless they are informed about it.

The powers-that-exist play upon public ignorance by inducing people into having a false sense of security. Equally a result, the public believes this action could non be occurring because they believe that they would take personally heard about it. This false conventionalities so provides insurance that this police will never exist contested in court, and every bit long as this law remains uncontested, chemtrail spraying volition keep unhindered.

The final result is that this craftily-written police force has washed its chore. It has enabled chemtrail spraying to continue without existence contested in courtroom. Additionally, this law continually provides legal protection for those doing the spraying. Later on all, by your inaction you take given them your permission.

When you consider the incredibly nighttime nature of this charade and when you lot consider the fact that this law gives your public servants the self-appointed ability to kill you, you lot should then consider what kind of people are running your land, or the world for that affair.

Supplement

This Public Law in The Usa Code: Title 50, 1520a

(portions of this article and more than data on the topic can be constitute at: globalskywatch.com)

view the document

jimenezanchoughboad1955.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/is-it-legal-for-the-government-to-conduct-aerial-spraying-operations-without-the-informed-consent-of-the-public/

Share this post